Sunday, December 13, 2015

Biblical Covenants



Let's talk about covenants. A covenant, in its most simplistic definition, is a promise. A Biblical Covenant is a promise of God, found in the Bible, made to His people. There are conditional covenants, meaning that both sides have an obligation to one another, but if either side fails on their end then the other side is no longer obligated to their end. There are unconditional covenants, meaning that no matter what one side does, the other side is still obliged to keep their end. God has made both kinds of covenants in the Bible. It is important to understand God's covenants, because some of them form the basis of our salvation. I am going to discuss five covenants: the Adamic, the Abrahamic, the Mosaic, the Davidic, and the New Covenant.

The Adamic Covenant is found in Genesis 3, specifically verse 15, and is essentially unconditional on God's end. He promised Adam and Eve that He would use the seed of the woman (who was to be the future Messiah, none other than Jesus) to crush the head of the serpent (Satan). Crushing a serpent's head would be a death dealing blow; this would be the ultimate defeat of Satan. God promised to do this and no action was required of Adam or Eve for God to fulfill His promise. As you can see, this directly related to Christ's atoning, redemptive work; our salvation. This was God's first promise of the coming Messiah and the defeat of Satan.

The Abrahamic Covenant is found in Genesis 12:1-3, and is repeated and expanded in Genesis 12:7, 13:14-17, 15:1-21, 17:1-22, and 22:15-18. This is also an unconditional covenant of God, made to Abraham and his descendants (the Hebrews/Israelites). This is the promise to make a nation of Abraham's descendants (Israel), and to give them the land of Canaan (the Promised Land). God stated He would cause these things to happen and nothing was required in exchange from Abraham. God gave Abraham commands, but if you read closely, the covenant God made was not contingent upon Abraham keeping any commands. In this Covenant, God also declared that through Abraham and his descendants, all the nations/peoples of the earth would be blessed. This was a further prophecy of the coming Messiah, and a narrowing of the lineage to Abraham. This certainly relates to our salvation. It is through Israel that the Messiah has come to the world. Thus, the apostle Paul tells us in Romans 11:17 that we (Christians) are grafted into the vine of Abraham and God's promise of the Messiah.

The Mosaic Covenant is found in Exodus 19-24, specifically 19:5-8. It is also further clarified in parts of Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy, especially Deuteronomy 28. Read Exodus 19-24 and Deuteronomy 28 to get a good summary. This is a conditional covenant (Exodus 19:5: "Now therefore, if you will... then you shall be..." NKJV). This was the beginning of the giving of the Law to the Israelites and the beginning of ancient Judaism. This covenant established the ancient Jewish priesthood, the sacrificial system, the dietary rules, and the ceremonies (holidays, feasts, etc.). It also gives us an understanding of God's moral laws for humanity. There is so much to say here, but in short, the Apostle Paul tells us that the Law was established as a "schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ" (Galatians 3:24, KJV) and the New Testament explains numerous times that the sacrifices were a foreshadowing of the one and only, true and perfect sacrifice of Jesus.
The Mosaic Covenant did not save anyone. God saves people by grace through faith in Christ. It is Jesus' atoning work that makes salvation possible, not the keeping of the Law of God by mankind. It is the extension of God's grace, imparted to us through the channel of faith, not works of the Law, that is the practical application of salvation. It is the election of God and the enlightening work of the Holy Spirit that calls people to salvation, not the pursuit of God by an unregenerate humanity (but that gets us into a free agency/election or free will/predestination conversation, which can be a topic for another time). The Mosaic Covenant was the method by which mankind was to approach God during the dispensation from the Exodus (Moses) to the First Advent (Jesus' First Coming). The Law has now been fulfilled and the Mosaic Covenant has been "replaced" by the New Covenant, which I will discuss shortly.

The Davidic Covenant is found in 2 Samuel 7, specifically 7:12-16, and Jeremiah 33:17-21, and elsewhere (including parts of the Psalms). The Davidic Covenant was an unconditional covenant with some conditional elements. The Davidic Covenant is God's promise that David's line will forever rule the throne of Israel and is very much about the Messiah (Jesus is a descendant of David). We know that there was some turmoil regarding the kingship of Israel after Solomon died, and even a curse upon one of David's descendants by God Himself (thus the conditional elements). Nevertheless, Jesus is a descendant of David and is and will be the King of Israel and all the world upon His Second Advent (Coming). See my blog post "The First Christmas" for more information on this.

Finally we come to the New Covenant, which is the last covenant I will discuss here. The New Covenant is the covenant of our faith, and the basis of Christianity. The New Testament is pretty much about the New Covenant. The New Covenant can be found described throughout the New Testament, but is referenced directly in Hebrews 8:6-13 (partly a reference to Jeremiah 31:31-34). See also Jesus' words in Matthew 26:28 and Luke 22:20. Again, there is so much to say here, but I will keep it brief. The New Covenant is both unconditional and conditional (as I will explain). It is conditional in the sense that its benefits are only extended to those who accept God's grace through faith. It is unconditional in the sense that, for those who accept, God does all the work. It replaces the Old Covenant (which is the Mosaic Covenant, or the Law) as the method by which mankind now approaches God, but it does not destroy the Law, which is still God's Law and will still be used as the basis for the judgment of the unredeemed. Hebrews 8:13 tells us that the New Covenant has replaced the Old, which is now obsolete. Yet Matthew 5:17-18 tells us that Jesus did not come to destroy the Law, but rather to fulfill it. Jesus kept the Law and was therefore the only Man who could be a sacrifice for the man who cannot keep it (and none of us can). Jesus was also God incarnate, so His death can propitiate, redeem, atone for, and extend to all mankind. The New Covenant is the reason why we (Christians) are not required to keep the ceremonial, dietary, and sacrificial portions of God's Law (we are specifically released from those requirements in various places in the New Testament; Acts 10:9-16, Acts 15:10-20, Galatians 5:1-6, Hebrews 10:1-18, and elsewhere). We are still expected to follow God's moral Law, not as a way to obtain salvation, but rather as an outgrowth of our faith, an expression of gratitude, and through obedience and conformity to the image of Christ.
Just as Christ fulfilled the Law, Christianity (the New Covenant) is a fulfillment of Judaism (the Old or Mosaic Covenant). The New Covenant also fulfills the Adamic, Abrahamic, and Davidic Covenants through the First (now past) and Second (yet future) Advents (Comings) of Christ. I know of no prophesied replacement for the New Covenant. The ushering in of the New Covenant established the Church (the Body of Christ; the Bride of Christ) of which all Christians (followers of Christ) living in the Age of Grace/Church Age (the current "dispensation") are a part. I will talk more about dispensations and some special characteristics of the Church in a future blog post regarding dispensations.

That finishes my brief explanation of covenants. Again, thanks for reading. As always, grace and peace to you.

Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Replacement Theology



There is a doctrine taught by many Christian churches known as Supersessionism, or Replacement Theology. In brief, this doctrine asserts that the Church has replaced, or superseded, the Nation of Israel in regards to God’s program and promises (those yet unfulfilled). Again, in brief, the doctrine asserts that the Nation of Israel forfeited her status as God’s chosen people when she (collectively/corporately) rejected her Messiah (Jesus) and that all of God’s favor and promises were then withdrawn from Israel and bestowed upon the Church.

There is a problem with this doctrine, and that is that it isn’t true. There are many arguments that may sound convincing that have been established by its proponents over the centuries, but the teaching is not found in the Bible, and any passages used by its proponents have been misapplied, misinterpreted, or simply misunderstood. Many of these aforementioned proponents were no doubt sincere and well-intentioned, but perhaps not all.

So where did this teaching come from? Assuming that its originators were operating from a non-nefarious position (and some may have had less than noble motivations), the teaching actually originates from an understandable theological quandary that its proponents were trying to satisfy.

The Nation of Israel ceased to exist in 70 AD/CE, after the Roman Empire leveled Jerusalem and the Jewish Temple (Herod’s Temple, not Solomon’s), and scattered the Hebrew people throughout its provinces (an event known as the Diaspora). Many Christians in the first and second centuries (AD/CE) no doubt expected Christ to return during their lifetimes and re-establish Israel and begin His prophesied kingdom on earth. He had promised to return and established His kingdom during His ministry. As the centuries passed, however, and the New Testament was canonized, and the Old Testament was studied in light of Jesus' ministry and God’s revealed Word written in the New Testament, it became clear that there was a problem. Israel no longer existed as a nation.

The more time passed, the bigger the problem seemed to become. No nation disbanded for so long had ever reformed itself in recorded history. Church theologians (the sincere ones anyway) had the promises of God regarding the Nation of Israel that were present in the Old Testament that clearly had not yet been fulfilled on the one hand, and the reality of the situation of Israel’s non-existence on the other. How could this be explained while maintaining the integrity of God and His Word (without God breaking His promises)? An answer emerged in the halls of Church theologians—Replacement Theology. In order to justify this teaching, explanations had to be made, new interpretations revealed, and Scripture reapplied (in this case, misapplied). Of course, not everyone over the centuries accepted this teaching.

Other theological subjects, such as eschatology (the study of the end times) and the Millennial Kingdom, had to be altered to fit this new doctrine. (How can a literal thousand-year kingdom exist with Jesus ruling as the King of Israel from Jerusalem if Israel was no longer part of God’s program?) So other incorrect teachings arose like “amillennialism” (“no Millennial Kingdom”), which taught that prophecies regarding the Millennial Kingdom were to be interpreted for spiritual and symbolic meanings and applications, rather than literal ones. Again, some theologians may have had less noble intentions (after all, if they could rule over the people instead of Christ, then there would be no need for Him to establish a literal kingdom), but not all.

But we see now through the lens of recent history (the past century) that God can fulfill His promises on His own. Israel became a nation again in 1948. Its borders expanded to include the entirety of Jerusalem in 1967. These are not proofs against Supersessionism, but they could be indicators that the fulfillment of God’s promises for Israel (those that are yet unfulfilled) could be on the horizon. Perhaps.

What is the lesson in all of this? Well, one lesson is that God doesn’t need our help to fulfill His promises, He will do that on His own. But a bigger lesson, I think, is that we don’t need to try to have an explanation for every Biblical teaching that doesn’t completely make sense to us; for example, the Trinity, the sovereign election of God (predestination and free agency), and the dual-nature of Christ (the deity of Jesus). Some of our lack of understanding might be a matter of perspective (this side of eternity, or the imperfection of our minds) like the proponents of Supersessionism who lacked the historical perspective that we have.

Keep in mind, it was not my intention with this post to discuss the particulars of God’s dispensations or covenants (specifically the New Covenant and Christ’s fulfillment of the Law). These are separate doctrines that I don’t tie-in with Replacement Theology as some others might. I consider Replacement Theology to specifically mean that the Church has replaced Israel and that all of God’s promises to Israel were forfeited by them and now apply to the Church.

As always, thanks for reading!

Thursday, December 25, 2014

The First Christmas



Therefore the Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold, a virgin will be with child and bear a son, and she will call His name Immanuel. (Isaiah 7:14, NASB)

…And the dragon stood before the woman who was about to give birth, so that when she gave birth he might devour her child. And she gave birth to a son, a male child, who is to rule all the nations with a rod of iron; and her child was caught up to God and to His throne. (Revelation 12:4-5, NASB)

               A sign indeed! A virgin having a child. Such a thing has never happened. If such a thing were to happen, it would certainly be worthy of attention.
Merry Christmas! This blog is a special blog. I didn’t plan on writing it, but the desire to do so hit me out of nowhere within the past couple of days, and kept getting stronger. So here I am, and I am going to tell you a story; the story of the first Christmas. I hope you enjoy!

               Matthew tells the story of the birth of Jesus by starting with a genealogy that traces Jesus’ lineage back to Abraham. (Matthew 1:1-16) This makes sense, because Matthew’s Gospel presents Jesus the Messiah as the King of Israel. So Matthew traces His lineage back to the very first Hebrew. Matthew also traces the lineage through Joseph, the adoptive father of Jesus, since kingship was inherited through the father’s line. In Matthew’s genealogy, we see a link to King David through David’s son and heir, Solomon. As a legally adopted child, Jesus would have had full claim to inheritance through Joseph, and as the eldest son, He would be the heir. Luke also gives a genealogy of Jesus, but he traces the lineage back to Adam. (Luke 3:23-38) This also makes sense, because Luke’s Gospel presents Jesus the Messiah as the Son of Man. So Luke traces His lineage back to the very first human. Luke also traces the genealogy through Mary, the birth mother of Jesus, showing the actual, biological bloodline. In Luke’s genealogy, we see a link to King David through David’s son, Nathan. As a biological child, Jesus was of the bloodline of the House of David. Why is this important? For at least two reasons. First, Old Testament prophecy predicted that the Messiah would come through Abraham’s and then through David’s descendants. Second, the Messiah is to eventually be the King of Israel, and God promised that the royal line would never pass away from the House of David. Another interesting point is that in Matthew’s genealogy, we see the royal line pass through Jeconiah (Matthew 1:11). But Jeremiah 22:30 has a blood curse from God placed on Jeconiah stating that none of his biological children would sit on the throne. How could God keep His promise to David that the throne of Israel would never pass from his lineage, yet at the same time honor the curse on the line of Jeconiah? The promise was kept because, although legally Jesus could claim the throne of David through the inherited lineage of Jeconiah through His adoptive father, Joseph, since He wasn’t a biological child of Joseph, the blood curse didn’t fall upon Him. But as a biological descendent of David through His birth mother, Mary, Jesus was still able to fulfill the promise of God that David’s line would remain on the throne of Israel. Therefore, Jesus fulfills the promise, avoids the curse, and inherits the throne!
               John’s Gospel also has a genealogy of Jesus, although it is harder to recognize, that traces Jesus’ lineage back to God. (John 1:1-3) This makes sense, because John’s Gospel presents Jesus the Messiah as the Son of God. Mark’s Gospel does not have a genealogy of Jesus. This also makes sense, because Mark’s Gospel presents Jesus as the Suffering Servant, and in ancient times, there was little to no need for a servant to trace his lineage.

               The story of the first Christmas actually starts in Luke chapter 1 with the announcement of the birth of Jesus’ cousin. Mary had an older relative (or cousin, according to the King James Version) named Elizabeth, who was married to a priest named Zacharias. Up to this point, Elizabeth and Zacharias had been unable to have children on account of Elizabeth being barren. But the angel Gabriel appeared to Zacharias and told him that he and his wife would have a son and that their son would be a forerunner of the Messiah, announcing His coming to Israel, as prophesied of by Malachi. (Malachi 4:6)
               In the sixth month of Elizabeth’s pregnancy, the angel Gabriel appeared to a virgin girl named Mary, who was engaged to be married to a man named Joseph. And Gabriel said to her:
“Greetings, favored one! The Lord is with you. Do not be afraid, Mary; for you have found favor with God. And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall name Him Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord God will give Him the throne of His father David; and He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and His kingdom will have no end.” (Luke 1:28-33)
Mary was understandably perplexed, and inquired:
               “How can this be, since I am a virgin?” (Luke 1:34)
Gabriel answered:
“The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; and for that reason the holy Child shall be called the Son of God. And behold, even your relative Elizabeth has also conceived a son in her old age; and she who was called barren is now in her sixth month. For nothing will be impossible with God.” (Luke 1:35-37)
After this, Mary travelled to visit Elizabeth, and Elizabeth’s baby, still in her womb, leaped for joy upon Mary’s arrival. Mary stayed with Elizabeth for the next three months, and departed around the time that Elizabeth gave birth. So Elizabeth gave birth to a son, and she and Zacharias named him John. He grew up to be John the Baptist.
Mary became pregnant, and upon learning of her pregnancy, Joseph, knowing that the child wasn’t his, decided to end their engagement quietly. But before doing so, he had a dream, and in his dream an angel appeared to him and said:
“Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary as your wife; for the Child who has been conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit. She will bear a Son; and you shall call His name Jesus, for He will save His people from their sins.” (Matthew 1:20-21)
So Joseph and Mary were married, and the Bible says that Joseph kept her as a virgin until Jesus was born. (Matthew 1:25) The Bible also says:
Now all this took place to fulfill what was spoken by the Lord through the prophet: “BEHOLD, THE VIRGIN SHALL BE WITH CHILD AND SHALL BEAR A SON, AND THEY SHALL CALL HIS NAME IMMANUEL,” which translated means, “GOD WITH US.” (Matthew 1:22-23)
Not only was this a fulfillment of the prophecy from Isaiah 7:14, but it was also a partial fulfillment of the prophecy from Genesis 3:15, which would be completely fulfilled with Jesus’ sacrificial death and resurrection. Jesus was the prophesied “seed” of the woman, Eve. (See my previous blog titled “The Fallen Ones, Part 3.”) God had declared to the serpent:
“And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her seed; He shall bruise you on the head, And you shall bruise him on the heal.” (Genesis 3:15)

               The story resumes while Mary is still pregnant. The Nation of Israel at the time was under the rule of the Roman Empire. Caesar Augustus sent out a decree for a census to be taken throughout the Empire. As a result, Joseph and Mary were compelled to leave their home in Nazareth, in the region of Galilee, and travel to Bethlehem, in the region of Judea, to register for the census, as Bethlehem was the ancestral home of Joseph’s family. While they were in Bethlehem, the time came for Mary to give birth.
               Now, the Bible doesn’t specify exactly what time of year this was. Some scholars speculate that it probably wasn’t in December, citing the unlikeliness of the Roman government to order a census requiring travel in the winter. Other scholars note that even in the winter, the climate is relatively mild throughout the land of Israel, and traveling would probably not have been too difficult at that time of year; other than the normal difficulties of a woman being almost full-term in her pregnancy traveling by foot and on the back of a donkey, or pulled in a cart, for the 70-mile trip. While it isn’t impossible that Jesus was born on December 25, it is probably unlikely. What is most likely is that His birth wasn’t in winter, and that December 25 was selected as the date to celebrate Jesus birth, or “Christ’s Mass” by the Roman (Catholic) Church in order to harmonize Christian belief with other pre-existing celebrations and traditions already present in the Empire when Christianity was adopted as the state religion in the fourth century (380 AD/CE). We also don’t know the exact year He was born. Most Bible scholars think it was sometime between 6 BC/BCE to 1 AD/CE. Based upon prophecy from the Book of Daniel that places the triumphal entry into Jerusalem likely in 32 AD/CE (see my previous blog titled “Caught Up, Part 3”), and the likelihood that He was crucified between the ages of 33 to 36, I suspect that Jesus was born in the year 3 or 4 BC/BCE. Either way, He was born and lived during the first part of the first century, and we know this from even secular historical sources outside of the Bible. (See the writings of the Roman-Jewish historian Josephus, as an example.)
               When Jesus was born to Mary in the town of Bethlehem, we are told that she wrapped Him in cloths and laid Him in a manger “because there was no room for them in the inn.” (Luke 2:7) There are a lot of assumptions about what this means, but here’s what we know. There was no room for them at the inn. Perhaps the places that would normally be available for temporary rent were full because of the census. Perhaps Mary and Joseph were refused a room because of the scandal of her having become pregnant before marriage. Perhaps they were given shelter at the inn’s stable or some other stable. Perhaps it was a stable or even guest quarters at a relative’s dwelling. Perhaps it was a cave where animals were kept. All we know is that they weren’t in a guest room at an inn. We also know that they weren’t in a home of their own, or else Jesus would not have been laid in a manger. A manger is a trough, or feeder, for animals, typically made from stone, wood, or metal. No matter the location of such a manger, this is certainly a humble place for the Savior of the world and the future King of Kings, let alone God in human flesh, to be laid after having been born.
               As the story continues, on the night that Jesus was born, an angel appeared to some shepherds who were tending their flocks outside of Bethlehem in the fields. Understand that being a shepherd was not a prestigious occupation at that time. The shepherds were understandably frightened at the sudden appearance of an angel (hyper-dimensional being), but the angel declared to them:
“Do not be afraid; for behold, I bring you good news of great joy which will be for all the people; for today in the city of David there has been born for you a Savior, who is Christ the Lord. This will be a sign for you: you will find a baby wrapped in cloths and lying in a manger.” (Luke 2:10-12)
Then, an assembly of angels appeared praising God. After the angels departed, the shepherds went into the town and found Mary and Joseph and the baby, Jesus. The shepherds told the family what the angels had told them and then they departed praising and glorifying God.
And that is the story of the first Christmas. But what about the wise men (you ask)? And what about King Herod (you ask)? Well, I’m glad you asked. Let me tell you that story.

               As we shall see, it was probably between 1 to 2 years after the birth of Jesus that He was visited by the wise men. And the Bible doesn’t specify how many there were, nor does it give their names. Tradition and Nativity displays show three wise men because there were three gifts. But here’s what we know from the Bible.
Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, magi from the east arrived in Jerusalem, saying, “Where is He who has been born King of the Jews? For we saw His star in the east and have come to worship Him.” When Herod the king heard this, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him. Gathering together all the chief priests and scribes of the people, he inquired of them where the Messiah was to be born. They said to him, “In Bethlehem of Judea; for this is what has been written by the prophet:” (Matthew 2:1-5)
Now who were these magi from the east? The magi were an ancient sect of religious astronomers from the ancient Persian Empire. During the time when Jesus was born, the Persian Empire no longer existed, but in its place existed the Parthian Empire, which was a rival empire to the east of the Romans. These magi were wealthy and scholarly dignitaries from a rival empire, who had travelled to Jerusalem, in the outer-rim Roman province of Judea, far from the central seat of Roman imperial power, probably with a large caravan of servants and armed guards (as they brought treasure with them to give to Jesus). We know that the Hebrew prophet Daniel was a chief wise man in the court of Babylon during the time of both the Babylonian and Persian Empires. We know from the Book of Daniel, that he was given a prophecy that predicted the time of the coming of the Messiah to Jerusalem. (See my previous blog titled “Caught Up, Part 3.”) It is possible, even probable, that these magi were part of a sect that was familiar with, and possibly even founded by, Daniel, and were aware of his writings and predictions. Being astronomers, they would have been familiar with the stars and would recognize anything new or different that appeared in the night sky. Having seen the star in the east, and possibly, or probably, being familiar with Daniel’s prophecies about the coming of the Messiah, knowing that the time was getting close, they travelled to Jerusalem to see if they could locate Him.
               Now who was Herod? We know a lot about him from secular history. He was actually not Jewish by birth, but was a Roman appointee governing the province of Judea. So when a group of foreign dignitaries from a rival empire arrive in his capital with their caravan and their servants and their soldiers and ask him, a Roman appointee, “Where is He who has been born King of the Jews?” it is understandable why he and all Jerusalem might be troubled. Certainly, his position could be threatened by a legitimate heir to the Jewish throne, but also the Roman control of the far-flung province could be threatened if the Parthian Empire decided to support an insurrection among the Jews.
               After telling the magi where to go (Bethlehem), Herod instructs them to go and find the child and report his location back to Herod so that he might go and “worship” him as well. Here is the continuation of the story:
After hearing the king, they went their way; and the star, which they had seen in the east, went on before them until it came and stood over the place where the child was. When they saw the star, they rejoiced exceedingly with great joy. And coming into the house they saw the Child with Mary His mother; and they fell to the ground and worshipped Him. Then, opening their treasures, they presented to Him gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh. And having been warned by God in a dream not to return to Herod, the magi left for their own country by another way. (Matthew 2:9-12)
Why did I say earlier that this event took place 1 to 2 years after Jesus was born? Because of a couple of reasons. The magi find Jesus and Mary in a house. So they had obviously moved by this point from wherever he had been born. But the primary reason is because after learning that the magi had left, Herod was enraged and sent his soldiers to kill all the male children in Bethlehem and its vicinity who were two years of age and under, based upon the time of the star’s appearance that he had previously obtained from the magi. (Matthew 2:7 and 16) But Herod failed in his attempt to kill Jesus, the Messiah and prophesied future King of Israel, because after the magi had left, an angel appeared again to Joseph in a dream and said:
“Get up! Take the Child and His mother and flee to Egypt, and remain there until I tell you; for Herod is going to search for the Child to destroy Him.” (Matthew 2:13)
So Joseph and Mary and Jesus stayed in Egypt until an angel told them to return to Israel after the death of Herod, which secular history asserts was sometime between 4 BC/BCE to 1 AD/CE. Upon returning to Israel, Joseph, Mary, and Jesus settled in Nazareth in the region of Galilee. (Matthew 2:19-23)

               And that, my friends, is the story of the first Christmas! Grace and peace to you.

*Note: all passages from Scripture in this post were quoted from the New American Standard Bible.